data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9f5f/d9f5ff89c695d9f55c6c5524d191a8ee5815a7bc" alt="Hope for the present, not the future"
Hope for the present, not the future
Given all of the strife that bombards my consciousness on a daily basis, why am I still writing hopelessly naïve articles about compassion and optimism et cetera on the internet? It’s a serious question, not really a rhetorical one. I wrote this article to see if I could come up with an answer; I think I recognized a few different factors, but I’m curious to know what you think after reading through the article. Let me know in the comments.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b675/0b675d85daa106c107771bcda2d1f5a9d1fb24b2" alt="Climate change is a mental health issue"
Climate change is a mental health issue
The recent essays and articles that I read for my thesis had a fascinating overlap: they were talking about climate, but they were also talking about mental health. Mental health issues such as depression and anxiety are a natural corollary of experiencing the climate changing. And this is something solarpunk can and should address now.